The Arc A310 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only €413.22 cheaper!
Advantages of the Arc A310
- Up to 71% cheaper – €167.40 vs €580.62
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 30 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
Arc A310 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
May 18th, 2023
Average FPS
128
100%
Min 1% FPS
75
100%
Price, €
€580.62
28%
Value, €/FPS
€4.53/FPS
60%
Buy on Amazon
€580.62
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€606.33
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€670.18
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€573.10
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€550.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,270.00
In Stock
Arc A310 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A310 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A310 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
43%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
23%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
16%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
12%
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
May 18th, 2023
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
22.06 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A310 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Not Available | MSRP | $499.00 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
28 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 121.7 GPixel/s |
56 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 344.8 GTexel/s |
2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 22.06 TFLOPS |