Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms Radeon Vega 10 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 1880 days older than Radeon Vega 10 Mobile.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Vega 10 Mobile
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 15 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 8% better in No Man's Sky than Radeon Vega 10 Mobile - 68 vs 63 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Apr 8th, 2019
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Apr 8th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
11.2 GPixel/s
37%
Texel Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
94%
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Vega 10 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
---|---|---|
Apr 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
Picasso | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
1400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |