Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290 outperforms GeForce GT 620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 290 is 539 days newer than GeForce GT 620.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290
- Performs up to 62% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than GeForce GT 620 - 52 vs 32 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 - 4 vs 1 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290 - 49 vs 275 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Radeon R9 290
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
GeForce GT 620
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 290
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GT 620
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
2.8 GPixel/s
4.619699719518231%
Texel Fillrate
11.2 GTexel/s
7.3927392739273925%
AMD Radeon R9 290 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2013 | Release Date | May 15th, 2012 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 600 |
| $399 | MSRP | Not Available |
| 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
| 512-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
947 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 700 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
