Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290 outperforms Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 290 is 2997 days older than Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290 - 50 vs 275 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
178
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€224.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €224.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 233 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
81%
Texel Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
73%
AMD Radeon R9 290 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$399 | MSRP | Not Available |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
512-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
947 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |