Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms Radeon R7 260X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 is 1983 days newer than Radeon R7 260X.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 - 115 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Performs up to 68% better in Sons Of The Forest than Radeon R7 260X - 47 vs 28 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 6 vs 2 GB
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon R7 260X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
GeForce GTX 1660
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1660
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 260X | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 14th, 2019 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$139 | MSRP | $219 |
| 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
| 104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.1 GB/s |
| 1100 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
| 1625 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |
