Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB outperforms Radeon R7 260 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB is 975 days newer than Radeon R7 260.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Performs up to 43% better in Monster Hunter: World than Radeon R7 260 - 76 vs 53 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 3 vs 2 GB
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Radeon R7 260
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
81.98 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
123 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 260 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 17th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 18th, 2016 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
$109 | MSRP | $199 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s |
| 1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1506 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1708 MHz |
| 1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2002 MHz |
