Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 250 outperforms Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 250 is 24 days older than Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Performs up to 4% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 25 vs 24 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 50 vs 55 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 2 vs 1 GB
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon R7 250
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
42.16216216216216%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
63.24324324324324%
AMD Radeon R7 250 | vs | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 1st, 2013 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | DDR3 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 730 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 780 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
