Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 9100 outperforms Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 9100 is 1371 days newer than Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 - 55 vs 230 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100
- Performs up to 152% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Radeon R7 250 - 111 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 16 vs 1 GB
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,846.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75071 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
15.416666666666668%
Texel Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
7.708333333333334%
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 250 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 10th, 2017 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $1599 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
DDR3 | Type | HBM2 |
128-bit | Bus | 2048-bit |
28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1200 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 945 MHz |