Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 3485 days newer than Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 50 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 135% better in Saints Row than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 94 vs 40 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM - 16 vs 2 GB
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
94
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€458.23
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €458.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
5.127362366474938%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
5.429234338747099%
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Not Available | MSRP | $499 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
730 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
780 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |