Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms the more expensive GeForce GTX 1630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 3008 days older than the more expensive GeForce GTX 1630.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 18% better in Counter-Strike 2 than GeForce GTX 1630 - 398 vs 338 FPS
- Up to 71% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1630 - €56.19 vs €194.92
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 - 19 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 4 vs 1 GB
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €56.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Buy for €194.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
2.5 GPixel/s
8.753501400560225%
Texel Fillrate
5 GTexel/s
8.753501400560225%
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28.56 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
57.12 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R5 230 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 28th, 2022 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
10.67 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
625 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1740 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
667 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |