Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3200 outperforms Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 2069 days newer than Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Performs up to 3% better in FIFA 23 than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 140 vs 136 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 50 vs 65 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€144.31
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €144.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2232 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
30.115830115830118%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
45.173745173745175%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | vs | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 1st, 2013 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$199 | MSRP | Not Available |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
1295 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 730 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 780 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |