Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 70 days older than Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 65 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 16% better in Dead Space than Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile - 52 vs 45 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
52
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€169.78
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €169.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10506 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
17.31 GPixel/s
32%
Texel Fillrate
34.62 GTexel/s
37%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro Mobile | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
64 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1082 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |