Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 1764 days older than Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 65 vs 190 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 7% better in Rust than Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile - 94 vs 88 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
Mobile • Jul 2nd, 2019
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
Mobile • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
17.31 GPixel/s
58%
Texel Fillrate
34.62 GTexel/s
33%
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| Radeon Pro Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
| 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 64 GB/s | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
1082 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
