Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro 5600M outperforms GeForce GTX 950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro 5600M is 1761 days newer than GeForce GTX 950.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
- Performs up to 14% better in Rust than GeForce GTX 950 - 103 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 - 50 vs 90 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 - 8 vs 2 GB
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
FPS
90
87%
Value, €/FPS
€1.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€112.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €112.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 250 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 15th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jun 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
73.22 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
183 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
38.02 GPixel/s
51%
Texel Fillrate
57.02 GTexel/s
31%
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 |
---|---|---|
Jun 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 20th, 2015 |
Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Not Available | MSRP | $159 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
HBM2 | Type | GDDR5 |
2048-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
394.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 105.8 GB/s |
822 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1024 MHz |
1144 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1188 MHz |
770 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1653 MHz |