Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro 5600M outperforms GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro 5600M is 3899 days newer than GeForce 210.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
- Performs up to 24% better in Rust than GeForce 210 - 103 vs 83 FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 8 vs 0.5 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro 5600M - 31 vs 50 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €57.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 15th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jun 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
73.22 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
183 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | vs | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
Jun 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 0.5 GB |
HBM2 | Type | DDR3 |
2048-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
394.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
822 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 520 MHz |
1144 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
770 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 400 MHz |