Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro 5500M outperforms Radeon R7 265 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro 5500M is 2099 days newer than Radeon R7 265.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
- Performs up to 28% better in Elden Ring than Radeon R7 265 - 50 vs 39 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 85 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 8 vs 2 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Radeon Pro 5500M
Mobile • Nov 13th, 2019
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro 5500M
Mobile • Nov 13th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
46.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
139.2 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
1450 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
