Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3090 outperforms Radeon 680M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 3090 is 854 days older than Radeon 680M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 680M
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 - 50 vs 350 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Performs up to 232% better in Immortals of Aveum than Radeon 680M - 63 vs 19 FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,579.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 275 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2020
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
37.09167544783983%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
18.992805755395683%
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon 680M | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2020 |
Navi II IGP | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 12-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 24 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR6X |
System-Shared | Bus | 384-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1395 MHz |
2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1695 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |