Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon w9-3475X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 42 days older than Xeon w9-3475X.
Advantages of Xeon w9-3475X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 72 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon w9-3475X - 123 vs 118 FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
123
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$270.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$270.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 244 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon w9-3475X | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Feb 15th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon W | Collection | Core i5 |
Sapphire Rapids | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 4677 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
36 | Cores | 10 |
72 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |