Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon w5-3425 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 42 days older than Xeon w5-3425.
Advantages of Xeon w5-3425
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Xeon w5-3425 - 160 vs 155 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
160
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.75/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$279.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$279.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon w5-3425 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Feb 15th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon W | Collection | Core i5 |
Sapphire Rapids | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 4677 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |