Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon W3690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4342 days newer than Xeon W3690.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 95% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon W3690 - 488 vs 250 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
488
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$270.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$270.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3690 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Gulftown | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |