Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 4929 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Xeon W3520
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 130 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 18% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon W3520 - 150 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
150
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$519
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$519 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6642 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3520 | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 170 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |