Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Xeon W-2125 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1528 days newer than Xeon W-2125.
Advantages of Xeon W-2125
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 120 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 9% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon W-2125 - 133 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W-2125 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2125 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon W-2125
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Core i9-12900K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W-2125 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
