Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Xeon W-11955M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 238 days newer than Xeon W-11955M.
Advantages of Xeon W-11955M
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon W-11955M - 452 vs 446 FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W-11955M
Server/Workstation • May 11th, 2021
Core i5-12400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W-11955M | vs | Core i5-12400 |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel BGA 1499 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
