Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Xeon Silver 4116 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1577 days newer than Xeon Silver 4116.
Advantages of Xeon Silver 4116
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 85 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Xeon Silver 4116 - 184 vs 165 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon Silver 4116 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon Silver 4116
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Core i9-12900K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon Silver 4116 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| Xeon Silver | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 12 | Cores | 16 |
| 24 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
