Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600GT is 5046 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Performs up to 27% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5645 - 143 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
143
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$179.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$179.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7231 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5645 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600GT |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |