Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2262 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 263 vs 239 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 120 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
263
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1099.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 16 |
44 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |