In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-2699A v4 is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 2600 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $979 more expensive!
Xeon E5-2699A v4
No clear advantages
Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 13% faster in Battlefield 6 – 71 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer – Apr 19, 2018 vs Oct 25, 2016
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer
- Up to 91% cheaper – $99.99 vs $1078.93
- Up to 91% cheaper
- Up to 92% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.40 vs $17.12/FPS
- Up to 92% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 65 vs 145 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Ryzen 5 2600: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
63 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
89%
Price, $
$1078.93
9%
Value, $/FPS
$17.12/FPS
8%
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
71 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Ryzen 5 2600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Ryzen 5 2600 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Cores
22-core
100%
L3 Cache
55 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
27%
L3 Cache
16 MB
29%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2699A v4 Oct 25th, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 2600 Apr 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Released | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| $4,938.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | AM4 |
| 145 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
