Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1836 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900K - 44 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 225 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 125 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Core i9-12900K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 16 |
44 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 145 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
