In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-2699A v4 is much slower than the Core i7-13700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2699A v4
No clear advantages
Core i7-13700K
- Up to 103% faster in Battlefield 6 – 128 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 103% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Oct 25, 2016
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 14% less energy – 125 vs 145 Watts
- Consumes up to 14% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Core i7-13700K: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
63 FPS
49%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
49%
Price, $
$1078.93
100%
Value, $/FPS
$17.12/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Core i7-13700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Core i7-13700K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Cores
22-core
100%
L3 Cache
55 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
67%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
73%
L3 Cache
30 MB
55%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2699A v4 Oct 25th, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| $4,938.00 | MSRP | $409.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 145W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
