In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-2696 v3 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 5950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2696 v3
No clear advantages
Ryzen 9 5950X
- Up to 42% faster in Battlefield 6 – 104 vs 73 FPS
- Up to 42% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 105 vs 145 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2696 v3 vs Ryzen 9 5950X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2696 v3 vs Ryzen 9 5950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2696 v3 vs Ryzen 9 5950X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2696 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
18-core
100%
L3 Cache
45 MB
70%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
78%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
67%
Ryzen 9 5950X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
16-core
89%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2696 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5950X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $799.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | AM4 |
| 145 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
