Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Xeon E5-2695 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 3781 days newer than Xeon E5-2695 v2.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 36% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 303 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 65 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
303
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$388.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$388.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2695 v2 | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |