Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2683 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 2614 days newer than Xeon E5-2683 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2683 v3
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 120 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 27% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 258 vs 203 FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
258
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$397.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$397.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2683 v3 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 16 |
28 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |