Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 120 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 32% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 162 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 9 7950X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2680 v3 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 12 | Cores | 16 |
| 24 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 170 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
