Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 120 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 13% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 343 vs 304 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
343
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$549
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$549 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 260 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2680 v3 | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 170 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |