Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2673 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2673 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2673 v3
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 105 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 62% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 267 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
267
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.12/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1099.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2673 v3 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |