Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 2614 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 120 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 22% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 214 vs 176 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2670 v3 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |