Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3422 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2667 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 42% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 132 vs 93 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
132
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.11/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$279
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2667 v2 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |