Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3313 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v2.
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 32% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 156 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
156
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$354.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$354.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 439 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2667 v2 | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |