Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E5-2660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-2660.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 29% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5-2660 - 269 vs 208 FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
269
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.01/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$270.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$270.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2660 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |