Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon E5-2643 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 3166 days newer than Xeon E5-2643.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 54% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2643 - 71 vs 46 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2643 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2643 - 32 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
71
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.03/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$498.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$498.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7723 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2643 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |