Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 4325 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 12% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2640 - 167 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
167
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.33/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$388.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$388.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7667 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |