Buy on Amazon
CA$349
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP $249
Availability
MSRP $249
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 4325 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2640
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E5-2640 - 249 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 16 vs 12 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
249
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$349
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D 8-Core, 16-Thread Desktop Processor
Buy for CA$349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2640
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
