Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 2614 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 90 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Rocket League than Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 786 vs 698 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i9-12900K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
90 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
