In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-2637 v3 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 7900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2637 v3
- Consumes up to 21% less energy – 135 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 21% less energy
Ryzen 9 7900X
- Up to 86% faster in Battlefield 6 – 130 vs 70 FPS
- Up to 86% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 19 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 8 years and 19 days newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2637 v3 vs Ryzen 9 7900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 7900X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
130 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
100%
Price, $
$314.49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2637 v3 vs Ryzen 9 7900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2637 v3 vs Ryzen 9 7900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2637 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
15 MB
23%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
66%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
41%
Ryzen 9 7900X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2637 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7900X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| $996.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | AM5 |
135W | Power Consumption | 170W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
