Buy on Amazon
CA$549
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP $549
Availability
MSRP $549
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Xeon E5-2630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3857 days newer than Xeon E5-2630.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2630
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 95 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 41% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-2630 - 312 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 9 7900X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
312
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.76/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$549
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X 12-Core, 24-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor, Cooler not Included
Buy for CA$549 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2630
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen 9 7900X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2630 | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 170 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
PCs Using Xeon E5-2630 or Ryzen 9 7900X
With selected game settings
235 FPS
CA$13.08/FPS
16 GB, 2 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$3,072.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
