The Xeon E5-2620 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 5 3600. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Xeon E5-2620
The Ryzen 5 3600 is better in every way
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 3600
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
Xeon E5-2620 vs Ryzen 5 3600 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Xeon E5-2620
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
166
87%
Min 1% FPS
112
89%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 5 3600
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
190
100%
Min 1% FPS
126
100%
Price, CA$
CA$135.02
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.71/FPS
100%
Xeon E5-2620 vs Ryzen 5 3600 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2620 vs Ryzen 5 3600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2620 vs Ryzen 5 3600 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2620
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
47%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
60%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 3600
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Xeon E5-2620 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $199.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Matisse |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
| 15 MB | L3 Cache | 32 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
