Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3326 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 169 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i9-14900K
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell-E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 85 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
