Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3068 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 23% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 205 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 58 vs 80 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$109
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7120 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |