Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Xeon E5-2440 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3313 days newer than Xeon E5-2440 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2440 v2
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 95 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 172% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-2440 v2 - 579 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
579
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.95/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$549
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$549 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2440 v2 | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 170 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |