The Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 9 3900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Xeon E5-1620 v4
The Ryzen 9 3900X is better in every way
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 3900X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 8 threads
Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 9 3900X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
180
94%
Min 1% FPS
120
94%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 9 3900X
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, CA$
CA$545
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.83/FPS
100%
Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 9 3900X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 9 3900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 9 3900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
10 MB
16%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Ryzen 9 3900X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
$294.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 GHz |
| 10 MB | L3 Cache | 64 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
